Have owned an Octa and currently have a Digitakt. That looks like an excellent standalone sequencer with no obvious limitations, but it doesn't do sampling. But for just sitting down with my music gear without a computer, the Digitakt is great.įYI I'm also considering getting a Squarp Hapax if and when they become widely available. If the song gets more complex, I always have the option of moving to the DAW. It can do everything needed for that, including controlling my external gear. The Digitakt is my quick, sit down and get something going box. You can extend it by reducing step resolution (for example using 8th note resolution gets you 8 bars), but that also has limitations. I tend to write longer melodies, so they don't always fit into 4 bars. People always talk about the lack of song mode as one of the biggest limitations, but for me it's actually the 4 bar limit on patterns. The Digitakt on the other hand has a lot of limitations, but the workflow is extremely quick and easy. I wound up selling it because I realized that my dream of going DAW-less was silly - for complex compositions it's just better to use a DAW. And you have to use the touch screen a lot, which I didn't like since it's not a great screen (it's no iPhone). You can do a ton with it, but with that comes a fairly complex (in my opinion) workflow. The MPC is basically a full-fledged DAW in a box. I'm a current Digitakt and former MPC One owner. I can't speak about the DT as I haven't used it much and never have considered it as I don't really have any need for it. As a composing tool, I'd say it's good enough, though you can't just play your Song from anywhere the same way you could do in a daw (like from the middle of a pattern) and it gets quite time-consuming for me. I do mainly live improvised stuff and I can't imagine using anything else than the Octatrack for that. (well, the Pyramid will be replaced, but that's another story.) I got the Pyramid for MIDI and I'm happy now. Plus I hated switching between the sample and midi sequencers. The MIDI sequencing sucked big time for me though when live-recording. And the Thru tracks, boy, is Octatrack a beast in being a cool mixer/effector. And even then I'd use them both side by side as I often run out of tracks due to the 2 effects limit (so I use neighbour tracks a lot). That said, the only thing that could replace my Octatrack MKI is an MKII. Other than that - and the fact that it's a huge and heavy device - I must say that Akai are the kings of sampling, sample layering (really abletonesque!), all this stuff that I'm actually considering getting one of the MPCs for. That and the fact you can only resample the master output (this might have changed). WHAT THE ACTUAL FLYING F*CK?! Haven't checked the latest updates too thoroughly, but this behavior afaik hasn't changed. You got a wonderful 8x8 grid and 8 rotary encoders each with a display, but whenever you need to edit a step, you must use the touch the display, select the notes there, select an operation and then use the big dial. It's not too far from that, but I returned it after a couple of days. I purchased the Force under the impression I'm getting Ableton in a box. Maybe also check out, because there's a dedicated Force forum and some serious expertise. There are a few Force owners, and we can answer questions. Nothing wrong with any of your proposals, but your description of what you wants tells me one thing: Force.Īt least, check out youtube videos, and ask here. Seriously, the Force is a much closer approximation to the clip-launching, arranger-wrangling view of Ableton-in-a-box.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |